The Purdue model can’t keep up with today’s connected factories. This whitepaper explains its limitations and introduces a practical blueprint for modern industrial security: identity-first, software-defined segmentation, and enclaves.
Content
Beyond Purdue: Rethinking Industrial Network Security
For decades, the Purdue Model was the gold standard for designing and securing industrial networks. By layering operations from the plant floor up to enterprise IT, it provided clarity, fault isolation, and a degree of safety.
But the world has changed.
Factories today connect legacy assets to the cloud, open up remote access for vendors, and rely on real-time data flows that cross traditional IT/OT boundaries. Meanwhile, cyber attackers have become adept at exploiting the cracks between layers. The result? Flat, brittle networks that no longer match the Purdue blueprint.
Why the Purdue Model No Longer Holds
The Purdue Enterprise Reference Architecture was designed in the 1990s for a world that was:
Mostly air-gapped
Dependent on proprietary protocols
Operated by internal staff
Built around static workloads
That world is gone. Today’s factories run on:
Cloud integration and SaaS tools
Cross-layer connectivity
Remote and third-party access
Assets that often lack authentication or defense mechanisms
Attempts to “patch” Purdue with more firewalls, VPNs, and monitoring tools often add complexity without solving the underlying problem: security still assumes trust based on location, not identity.
A New Blueprint for Modern Industrial Networks
Moving beyond Purdue doesn’t mean tearing everything out. Instead, manufacturers can overlay lightweight, software-defined security that adapts to how operations actually run. Four principles stand out:
1. Identity First
Access should follow the user, device, or workload—not the IP address or switch port. Strong authentication and cryptographic identities make trust explicit.
2. Software-Defined Segmentation
Instead of hardwiring VLANs and firewall rules, define policies in software. Who can talk to what is intent-driven, portable, and enforceable at scale.
3. Enclave-Based Access
Group assets into enclaves shaped by purpose, not by hierarchy. A PLC, its HMI, and a historian may form one enclave, regardless of which “level” they sit in. This approach supports vertical data flows without flattening the network.
4. Zero Trust with Proxies
Most OT devices can’t run security agents. Instead, enforce Zero Trust through inline proxies that authenticate, log, and control traffic on behalf of the devices they protect.
What This Means in Practice
A rogue laptop plugged into a switch port won’t get access without identity.
A vendor’s remote session can be scoped tightly to a single robot enclave.
A legacy controller can be isolated without modifying its firmware.
The outcome is a network that adapts to change, contains threats, and supports modern workflows—without the heavy lift of a full infrastructure rebuild.
Closing Thought
The Purdue Model served industry well for decades. But it was built for stability, not agility. Today’s industrial operations need an architecture that’s dynamic, identity-driven, and Zero Trust by default.
The good news? It doesn’t require starting from scratch. With overlay networks, enclave-based controls, and proxy enforcement, manufacturers can modernize quickly, securely, and at scale.
Autres articles de blog de Trout