Compliance, Produced By The System Itself.
Visibility, inventory, proof of access, and automated exports in one integrated place. The evidence your framework asks for is a by-product of running the Access Gate, not a separate project.
Access Gate turns everyday operation into compliance evidence. Because it sees the whole network, keeps a live inventory, and records every identity-bound session, the visibility, inventories, encryption, and proof of access that frameworks demand all come from one system, and you export them on demand.
Four things, from one system
Most teams stitch compliance together from separate tools. Access Gate produces the OT-side evidence from a single place, so the picture is consistent and always current.
Visibility
Passive network visibility discovers every device and every user on the OT network, with no scanning and no production impact.
Inventory
A continuous, dynamic inventory of assets and identities, fed by that visibility and kept current automatically rather than by spreadsheet.
Proof of access
Every session is identity-bound and recorded, so you can show who reached which asset, when, and what they did. Tamper-evident, on-premise.
Automated exports
Turn the live picture into evidence: generate the reports and evidence packs an assessor asks for, on demand, instead of assembling them by hand.
The same evidence, every framework
CMMC, NIS2, and NERC CIP ask similar questions: what is on the network, who can reach it, and can you prove it. The dedicated pages show the row-by-row mapping.
CMMC
Access control, audit and accountability, and system inventory evidence for CUI enclaves.
NIS2
Article 21 access-control, asset management, and incident-handling evidence for essential and important entities.
NERC CIP
Interactive Remote Access, system inventory, and access-monitoring evidence for the bulk electric system.
Point tools, or one integrated system
| Capability | Spreadsheets + point tools | Access Gate |
|---|---|---|
| Asset inventory | Manual spreadsheet, stale the day it is built | Continuous, updated from live traffic |
| Network visibility | Periodic scans with blind spots | Passive and always-on, no scanning |
| Proof of access | Shared accounts, no attribution | Identity-bound, per person, recorded |
| Audit evidence | Assembled by hand for each assessment | Exported on demand |
| Where the data lives | Scattered across tools and SaaS | One system, on-premise |
| Framework coverage | A different tool per framework | One evidence set maps to CMMC, NIS2, NERC |
OT compliance, answered
It watches the network passively to build visibility and a live inventory, and it brokers every session so each access is identity-bound and recorded. Compliance evidence is a by-product of running the system, not a separate project: you export it on demand.
No. It produces the OT-side technical evidence that frameworks require, visibility, inventory, and proof of access, and exports it. It feeds your GRC or audit process rather than replacing it.
The same underlying evidence maps across CMMC, NIS2, and NERC CIP, because they ask similar questions: what is on the network, who can reach it, and can you prove it. The dedicated pages show the row-by-row mapping.
No. Discovery is passive and agentless, and the evidence is produced and stored on-premise. There is no dependency on an external service.
Access Gate secures your assets first, then exposes the simple services your teams and vendors actually want, so they run through the sanctioned path, not around it.
OT runs through you, not around you.